• ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    In terms of fully free, obligatory mention:
    Your library may offer more than books alone, depending on how well supported they are. Borrow music, movies, sometimes even video games. For music and movies they may also offer these to borrow digitally as well via online services they coordinate with.

    • Mist101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The library of things is also something many public libraries have now. Not just media, but tools, power tools, cooking pans and equipment, pod casting equipment. Definitely worth a look.

      • kassiopaea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Jellyfin Is completely open source, fully self-hosted, and free. With Plex the software still has to phone home to a central server for authentication and some features are locked behind a paywall.

        No streaming software is going to find movies for you (without paying for content they’ve licensed) because that would be a sure fire way to get the project taken down for copyright violation.

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Making sure to keep it legal, right?

    Let’s stick with Project Gutenberg - Public domain ebooks and other media, spanning centuries. They’re incredibly important for keeping our literary past alive.

    I might have more later.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I got a cooking book from the 1800s there, sadly the pricing is a bit off, I don’t think that recipe is 19 pence anymore.

    • ValiantDust@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There’s also LibriVox for audiobooks of public domain books read by volunteers. They vary in quality but some of my favourite audiobooks are from there.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Closing your eyes, slowly taking a deep breath, and calmly, breathing in, and breathing out, while focusing on the sensations in your body, and how much more relaxed you’re feeling right now

    i.e. meditation

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Syncthing.

    Connect any two devices’ folders together wirelessly, from anywhere.

    Don’t have a server? You don’t need one. Every device is an individual node.

    Backup? If you do have a server, offload some of your content and keep on rolling, or set scripts to move files by age.

  • cobalt32@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    In California (and Connecticut), you don’t have to pay to use the air pumps at gas stations. You can just go inside and ask them to turn on the air pump, and they legally have to.

  • dave@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    KDE Connect. its an app that lets you share lots of different things between your devices, and it does this over your home network without needing any “cloud”

    • send files from one device to another
    • share the clipboard. handy for copying text or a link to your phone
    • get notifications from your phone on your laptop
    • have music playing on your laptop and pause or change the track from your phone
    • control your laptop from your phone, move the cursor around, left/right click etc
            • SippyCup@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              The land was there before you, it’ll be there after you die. You provide nothing of value. You’re a drain on society. Every single one of your tenants would be better off if you and everyone like you didn’t exist.

              • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                On the contrary. I provide value of upkeep and managing the estate I rent. Without me people wouldn’t have place to live because they cannot afford to purchase the land.

                Thanks to me countless people are able to have a roof under their heads.

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Landlords have guaranteed that tenants won’t bother to clean the place up by establishing the precedent over many years that they won’t refund your deposit no matter how spotless you leave the property. Everyone knows it and after getting screwed enough times, tenants are incentivized to leave a mess as an act of defiance.

      • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Sounds like fake news to me. I don’t do that for example. I don’t know many People of Land beside myself but I rather treat it as a beneficial service to the community that I happen to be able to support myself from.

          • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            You think so yet I provide accommodation for dozens of people. If I stop they are homeless because no one will rent them for my price. If there is a mold outbreak they get cancer. If someone comes with bugs I need to handle the bugs. If something breaks I need to repair it.

            If someone is drunk and on drugs I need to kick them out so the rest of people are okay

            It’s not some kind of passive income lol

            There are various activities slightly less profitable for less work but I enjoy providing this service. Also I like renovation and interior design. It’s a real art to make interiors the most appealing with least amount of money.

  • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    lichess.org is a fantastic online chess platform for players of all skill levels. it’s free and—what’s more–it’s ad-free (unlike the parasitic organisation that’s squatting on the chess.com domain).

    it has one-on-one on-demand match-ups, tournaments, puzzles, user-published training courses, multiple chess variants, and so much more.

    it’s one of only two online resources to which i deem donating regularly worthwhile (the other being wikipedia).

    do check it out. chess is one really healthy mental habit to inculcate.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I find the dynamics of lichess.org vs chess.com very interesting.

      They are similar in terms of features. Both have decent interfaces, puzzles, matchmaking, live viewing boards and broadcasts for tournaments, training programs, etc. But chess.com has ads, and features locked behind subscription paywalls where lichess.org does not. (Everything is free on lichess, except for the little logo next to a user’s name to say they have supported the site with donations.)

      But on the other hand, chess.com seems to have a higher number pro players; and probably a larger number of players overall.

      I think its very interesting to think about why that is the case. Why would more people choose the version that is more expensive, but does not have more features?

      I’ve thought of a few reasons, but I think probably the biggest effect is that chess.com has more money to splash around (because it sells ads, and asks for user subscriptions), and it uses big chunk of this money to advertise itself. eg. by sponsoring players and streamers, offering larger prizes for its own tournaments; etc.

      And although I definitely think lichess is better, since it is generously supplying a high-quality product without trying to self-enrich, I do sometimes think maybe what chess.com is doing is ok too: in the sense that it is not only self-enriching, but also supporting the sport itself a bit by paying money to players, events, and commentators. Lichess does this too - but less of it, because they have less money.

      (Note that chess.com also does some really crappy stuff, such as censoring any mention of lichess in the chat of their twitch broadcasts. That definitely does not help support the sport.)