I hearby petition an amendment for an expansion of the child protective laws to widen the definition of abuse, neglect, and reckless abandonment of children to include:

“letting children browse without ad blockers”

I mean that’s the point of research: to demonstrate real world problems and put it in more concrete terms so we can respond more effectively

lmao wait what holy shit is that line originally from Arthur??? that sounds exactly like something the bunny dude would say

Check the story! They knew they were going to die. That was the point. He told them. He told them exactly what was up and they consented. Their minds were so twisted by his lies that they couldn’t imagine any other life. That’s what drinking the koolaid means: you subscribe to a belief wholeheartedly, even a crazy one, to the point where youd rather die than question it.

you need to be careful with your assumptions. Just because it looks like facts can connect and lead to natural conclusions does not mean they do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid

it was a tool of mass suicide not a drug to get high on lol

Alice and Bob are names of User A and B in cyber security textbooks I think

I remember that one time I learned man was mortal from all my studying, leading me to carry poison around but put it at maximum arms length whenever I pour it into a glass

I’m sorry but this is fucking stupid. WHO is calling WHAT immoral? Someone babbling on recycling, who the fuck cares about recycling?

Poorest people are 100% capable of making choices that align with their personal values as anyone else. This is such a fucking Christian thread. What, do you think morals come from the Bible? what a joke

oh… so the joke is what if the fascist is fat?

that uh didn’t help

keep in mind that a married couple can combine incomes.

it’d be damn hard to afford a mortgage on your own but two people can make it work quite comfortably

debt? our mortgage costs the same as my sister’s rent, but we’re not pissing our money away to a landlord every month. when we sell the house, we’ll be getting our value back and then some. even if we only stay a couple of years and merely break even, we’re essentially living rent free during this time

it was a pun

should have tried a more violent response

who is he

Fair question! I’m not sure if there are any other industry figures holding major positions in the federal government but that would definitely be worth discussing if it isn’t just Elon

(real)

of course you didnt. that’s why the misunderstanding comes in. I just wonder what you’re implying with that comment… the interpretation i gave above is the first thing that comes to mind. like, so what if the author didn’t consider that, what changes?

id be happy to hear a clarification!

So you’re saying that a corrupt man in power uses that power to benefit himself at the expense of the public, but it’s not corruption, because additional parties also happen to benefit?

i must be misunderstanding

it highlights the fact that these LLMs refuse to say “I don’t know”, which essentially means we cannot rely on them for any factual reporting.