Oh I think I know how this will end.

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Thank goodness, now I can defend my home against tyranny and people who look different than me with a pseudo-machine gun, just the way the Founding Fathers intended! (/s just in case)

  • Pnut@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I get gun enthusiasm. Like, as a hobby. Those folks that hang out at the range are as nerdy as the folks that hang out at the model airplane club. This isn’t for them. This is for the baddies. It’s strange considering that Trump had a close attempt on his life involving a gun with iron sights. You would think he would want to be the last person involved in approving more effective people killers.

    • Zealousideal_Fox_900@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Sandy Hook 2 Electric Boogaloo. I can feel nothing but sorrow for the children of america’s education system. Forget not Columbine, Sandy Hook, Uvalde, Virginia Tech, Parkland, Texas Tower, Red Lake, or Santa Fe.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wasn’t the bump stock banned by Trump after the Vegas shooting? Then unbanned under Biden?

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes. Trump is not actually friendly to gun rights.

      If he was, he’d be pushing to get the Hearing Protection Act (HR 404) and the Stop Harassing Owners of Rifles Today (HR 2395) out of committee and to the floor for a vote.

      Biden wasn’t friendly to gun rights either. I don’t think most politicians are friendly to gun rights, since if they actually managed to expand them to what they should be, they wouldn’t have any major issue remaining to campaign on.

    • Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sure. But this isn’t a bump stock. It’s a forced reset trigger that was just unbanned… Which is insane. It essentially converts semi automatic weapons to automatic weapons.

      • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You see, this thread is where I first learned of the FRT (Forced reset Trigger), I had no idea such a device existed until now. The only device I had known before was the bump stock which is what I thought it was.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        But it doesn’t.

        An automatic firearm shoots multiple bullets each time you pull the trigger, until you release the trigger; the trigger does not reset.

        With most semi-automatic guns, you have a light spring that resets the trigger once you release your finger. A forced reset trigger (FRT) forces the trigger to reset. The FRT pushes the trigger forward, even if you’re trying to keep the trigger pulled back. If you keep tension on your finger, as soon as it’s reset, you’re pulling it again. So, legally, you are pulling the trigger multiple times, because the trigger is resetting each time a bullet is fired.

        Based on the way that a machine gun is defined in the National Firearms Act of 1934, an FRT is not a machine gun. The ATF can’t re-write the law to say what they want it to say; that requires an act on congress.

        The is compounded by the fact that Rare Breed ran the idea by the ATF before they went into production, and they have/had a memorandum from the ATF saying that an FRT was not a machine gun, and not subject to the NFA. After they had approved it, and *after Rare Breed had produced and sold a few hundred/thousand, the ATF raided Rare Breed, and also showed up at customer’s homes demanding items that the customers had legally purchased (e.g., unreasonable search and seizure, a 4A violation).

        Machine guns have been illegal in the United States since 1986, a notion that even gun rights groups have come to accept.

        This is… Not true. The Firearm Owners Protection Act–among other things–made it illegal to transfer automatic firearms manufactured after '86 (i.e., “post ban”) to non-police/military people. Machine guns produced prior to '86 that were already in the hands of non-police/military people can still legally be own and bought/sold. A pre-ban select-fire AR-15 will run about $30k+ these days.

        Secondly, there are a number of groups and people still actively fighting to overturn the NFA as being a violation of 1A. There was a case out of the 5th circuit (?) not that long ago that points out the circular logic of the gov’t in re: machine guns. E.g., per Heller, guns in common use can’t be banned, and machine guns aren’t in common use, so they can be banned. But they aren’t in common use because they were largely banned by the gov’t. The gov’t created the condition of them not being in common use by banning them, and then used the lack of common use–due to the ban–as justification for the legality of the ban.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          There’s a WW2 reenactor I know with a Jeep with a working quad M2 (the do it yourself version of the M45 anti-aircraft emplacement which is a quad M2 but with fancier production). $450k for the whole thing.

          Machine guns (and tanks) are legal for the rich.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    In other countries they sell modified versions of these handguns that cannot be made into machine guns with a switch. This is the real solution, but for some reason gun manufacturers can do no wrong in the US and are not held to higher safety standards.

    • LucidiaDiamond@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      In Belgium, of all places, you can buy fully auto weapons from shops with just a collectors license.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you have evidence to support that? Because AFAIK, the Glocks made both in the US and Austria have exactly the same design. OTOH, in most of Europe, it’s very difficult to get the appropriate license for a handgun, so it’s largely irrelevant.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Glocks sold in Europe are designed not to work with switches. This is common knowledge.

        https://www.abc4.com/news/national/ap-new-jersey-minnesota-sue-glock-over-switch-that-allows-pistols-to-fire-like-machine-gun/

        “Glock is profiting by continuing to sell the adaptable version in U.S. markets, even as they make and sell handguns in Europe that cannot accommodate such a switch.”

        Do you have evidence to support your claims or should I just block you now?

        Edit: A quick look through you comments shows you are definitely a gun nut. Hard pass on discussing anything with your denialist guns r gud mentality.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Hard pass on discussing anything with your denialist guns r gud mentality

          Yeah, isn’t is strange that someone doesn’t want the state to have the monopoly on violence, and believes in civil rights? Weird, right?

          From your article:

          “Platkin said Glock is profiting by continuing to sell the adaptable version in U.S. markets, even as they make and sell handguns in Europe that cannot accommodate such a switch.”

           This is something I've having a really hard time finding a source on. Everything I can find says that that about half of the Glock pistols that are sold in the US are made in Austria. And, as I said, sales in Europe for pistols are very tightly controlled, meaning that very few pistols--relatively speaking--are getting into the hands of anyone other than cops and military, so I'm not sure that there's a strong motive for them to make the design alteration in the EU.
           Aside from the assertion from New Jersey's AG, I just can't find a source for that. I'm not saying that it doesn't exist, and, if the AG is correct, then yes, Glock should change their design in the US. There's already precedent for this; open bolt semi-automatic firearms manufactured after 1986 are banned because they can--in general--be readily converted to full auto. However, given how many Glocks currently exist in the US, that would be an enormous legal mess that could possibly result in the National Firearms Act being declared unconstitutional.
          

          “Also known as “auto switches,” the devices, which are already illegal in New Jersey and some other states, […]”

          They’re illegal in EVERY state; it covered under federal law, specifically the National Firearms Act (1934) and Firearm Owners Protection Act (1986). Even if it was legal in New Jersey, it would still be a felony to possess or use one.

  • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “We were going to win this,” said the former senior ATF official. “These things are not like bump stocks."

    Forced reset devices are actually exactly like bump stocks in that they’re legal because they force a distinct action of the trigger for every round fired. The legal definition of a machine gun is a firearm that fires more than one round per single action of the trigger. They haven’t bothered to amend or expand that definition, so these types of devices keep skirting by on a technicality.

    I suppose the argument could be made that forced reset devices work in a very similar way to a machine gun’s auto sear, the difference being that they act on the trigger of the gun rather than the hammer, but it still doesn’t meet the government’s own definition of a machine gun.

  • Cornpop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nice I’ve been wanting a FRT. machine guns aren’t very good for mass shootings. All your ammo is gone instantly and you’re way less accurate. It’s good for suppressing fire, and fun in the backyard. This is not going to lead to more gun deaths.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I like how you are acting like most of us haven’t played an FPS. The biggest difference is that there is no balance nerf between the damage an automatic bullet does and a semiautomatic bullet does. It’s certainly leading to more gun deaths in Mexico, where a lot of these weapons are getting exported down to, although it is refreshing to act like school shootings still aren’t a thing.

      I fully expect for police to have to fear being “suppressive fired” soon enough, there are enough militant groups within the US that will enjoy the news, specially given the number of their members that were pardoned for Jan 6th.

      • Cornpop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Games are not equal to real life. 99 percent of people would have no idea how to control a machine gun.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            How many people actually go out to a range every single week and burn through a couple hundred rounds working on training drills though? I did shooting at distance today (100-550y with .223) and burned through about 140 rounds, and most ranges don’t even have that kind of distance available. (Thank fuck the RSO had a spotting scope; I couldn’t see my splash in the grass to see where my rounds were going when I didn’t hit. He was able to see trace with his scope though.)

            • mothersprotege@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Not a lot, I imagine! Still a pretty low hurdle to clear. All you really need is ammunition and a place to shoot it. It sure helps to have a spotter/RSO/somebody who knows what they’re doing, but you can muddle through all right given enough trigger time.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It’s enough to learn when you are being gaslighted about machine gun ammo consumption. Yes, it eats ammo faster, but it is also more dangerous. Furthermore, being fully automatic doesn’t mean you spam it until it consumes the whole cartridge, it means you have more control how many bullets you can track with each trigger engagement. It’s why burst mode exists, but better. People do have an idea in how to control ammo consumption, it is a core game mechanic with most games with guns.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Let us not forget… an FRT doesn’t even constitute a “machine gun” by their own definition!

      • Zenith@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d like to know too in Washington state, I’m considering have an out of state relative buy one for me in the mean time

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, they literally have a force feedback loop of propaganda aimed at themselves 24/7.

      They think they own all 500 million guns in the US and they are all John J Rambo

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s a select fire switch which is a little different.

      What this is about are Hellfire Triggers which are impossible to control. If you know what one looks like, you can make it yourself.

  • thallamabond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    The history on this is interesting

    Trump banned bump stocks as a reaction to the Vegas massacre.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-administration-issues-rule-banning-bump-stocks-year/story?id=59884493

    Then the supreme court ruled that unconstitutional.

    https://www.npr.org/2024/06/14/g-s1-2929/supreme-court-bump-stocks

    Now the trump admin is going to permit more things like the bump stock to be sold legally. Specifically, something that makes a semi automatic gun fire much more rapidly.

      • AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        This really wouldn’t make a difference. It isn’t hard to bend a coat hanger or drill a third hole.

        Also, FRTs and bump stocks are really just range toys.