Despite the naysaying, isn’t this a good thing? Seems the new chair wants impartiality
Centrists benefited for decades from partiality. Now that someone else is playing their game the same way they’ve been playing it, they decide that they want to be impartial. I have no faith whatsoever in the party’s interpretation of neutrality. It just means partiality in favor of centrists.
Neutrality for thee but not for me. They want neutrality from Hogg, but were delighted with partiality in the opposite direction for decades.
Yeah I would second the view, if it weren’t for decades of the opposite of the DNC bending over backwards for it’s incumbants.
For centrist incumbents. Henry Cuellar gets protection. Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman do not.
See? They can push back on something.
Suddenly and when it’s convenient isn’t always.
I do not feel you’re being very fair to what I am saying and I am feeling rather misinterpreted in a hostile way
If you seriously expect me to believe, despite the past dozen years, that democrats treat republicans worse than they treat progressives, you have been interpreted correctly.
I know.
No apparently we’re done interacting
As soon as I ask a question you know the answer to, but don’t want to answer. At least you’ve finally accepted that I don’t want to interact with you, now that it’s convenient.
Too bad it won’t last.
Thank you for the illustration.
So the party treats progressives worse than it does republicans, then?
So, you’ve gone from telling ridiculous lies about how rejecting progressives and kissing republican ass is somehow treating progressives better than republicans. When you were called on it, you acted like you said nothing of the sort, and now you’re sealioning.
I don’t want to talk to such distilled dishonesty anymore. It’s bad for the soul to be reminded you exist.
I will not be interacting with someone who insults my intelligence as harshly as you just did.
I’m so glad the internet hasn’t forgiven them for that.
I’m a bit sad that not everyone remembers when they made up a movie critic so they would have good quotes to put on ads for Sony Pictures movies.
If he had lost, it would be touted as proof that progressives can’t win in red states. Since he won,
His record doesn’t exactly stand out as extremely liberal or progressive
They aren’t treated worse because that makes no sense
The messaging to progressives is “You will shut up and vote as we order you. We will never listen to your concerns and we will blame you for every loss we earn.”
The messaging to republicans is “Ok, who do we have to throw under the bus to get your support, Mr. Cheney, sir?”
Yes, progressives are treated worse. Your gaslighting is predicated on a ridiculous lie and I will not be interacting with someone who insults my intelligence as harshly as you just did.
Hogg is looking to primary centrists in deep blue districts. David Hogg is pro-gun control.
If this thread is anything like the other recent threads about him, we’ll see centrists suddenly decide that what the American people really want is more school shootings.
Some people can’t admit progressives can win red states.
It’s almost as though all the talk from centrists about how progressives can’t win in red states was complete self-serving bullshit.
Why should progressives running against democrats while railing against the Democratic Party expect a helping hand from their opponent/the democratic party?
Why should progressives get treated worse by democrats than republicans do? You’re acting like progressives are instigating here.
I’m sure that’s why centrists are suddenly freaking out.