• Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The article makes it appear as if she called the child a slur for no reason at all.

    She basically did. I don’t see a reason for taking her motives into account whatsoever. If she was a kindergartner you’d say something like “I don’t wanna hear it! You don’t call people that.” and that would be the end of it.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          I already said it’s not an excuse for her behavior but it is important context for the story. The article makes it seem like she called him a slur without any provocation whatsoever. Whether the allegation is true or not is a different story, but it’s definitely leaving out an important detail from the video.

          • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You could have stopped at “not an excuse”. She used a socially sanctioned word against a child, she revelled in repeating it when questioned, she played victim, claimed doxxing and grifted.

            I wouldn’t care whatever inconvenience she may run into.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not the words that are hurting you in that case, it’s the people with guns who are enforcing them.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Shut the fuck up and kill yourself.

        …did that feel good to be on the receiving end of, or did it hurt?