cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoThe first folding e-reader is smaller than a paperbackwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square10linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkThe first folding e-reader is smaller than a paperbackwww.theverge.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square10linkfedilink
minus-squarebloup@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoI never understood why nobody made an E reader that you could read “like a book” that just had two screens and a hinge
minus-squareBK85@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoWhy would you want that if you can have something light that can be held in one hand?
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agofor the vibes of course, not everything has to be optimised for practicality
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agobut then i’d need to swipe to flip the page on both of them, that’s like, effort
minus-squarePostaL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agonot everything has to be optimised for practicality
minus-squareflyhunter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI see what you did there ;)
I never understood why nobody made an E reader that you could read “like a book” that just had two screens and a hinge
Why would you want that if you can have something light that can be held in one hand?
for the vibes of course, not everything has to be optimised for practicality
Two Kindle, one duct tape
but then i’d need to swipe to flip the page on both of them, that’s like, effort
not everything has to be optimised for practicality
I see what you did there ;)