• Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    SYAC: The key sentence: "Bluesky, despite its innovative technology and good intentions, is built on the same venture-capital-backed foundation that has led so many promising platforms to eventually prioritize shareholders over users. " Mastodent wins!

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I look forward to the documentary.

    “Mastodon: Victory Through Technical Superiority”, available soon on Laserdisc and Betamax

    • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think anybody who administers a mastodon server thinks it’s superior technology.

      What mastodon isn’t is funded by fashy techbro asswipe VCs who will turn it into a torment nexus over time, just like X and Meta and Alphabet.

      So Mastodon will continue to attract a small minority of people who don’t feel safe or wanted on a fashbro site. And that’s fine. I want to talk to people who think I’m human, not a bunch of Andrew Tate gargling fuck heads.

    • coacoamelky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Feeling like the mastodon crowd are preaching on soap boxes here. Not a bad product but will it attract the general public, probably not .

        • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          People prefer to drown than pick option which is not corporate bullshit. Bluesky won because it’s centralized, and people don’t have to decide over instance.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Why are you on Lemmy? Or, why do you think the decentralised model works here, but not on mastodon?

            Or is it only working because there is no third party VC-backed reddit clone?

            • Fizz@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Lemmy users can subscribe to a community and get tons of posts. I’d have to find 100 people to follow on mastodon to match what a single Lemmy community provides.

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Lemmy is barely a thing. Lets not get ahead of ourselves.

              People do prefer centralized platforms with shiny front-faces and easy-to-navigate corporate bullshit. The reason why that stuff is so successful is because it works.

              People fled to Bluesky because advertisers moved to Bluesky.

                • ameancow@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  There are brands moving there, that’s how a place starts generating value or the perception of value. I saw the same shit happen with twitter and reddit back in the day, this is just the same cycle repeating.

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think anyone is claiming technical superiority. And certainly not financial superiority.

      But maybe some kind of resilience to the forces of destruction plaguing commercial social media.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        But maybe some kind of resilience to the forces of destruction plaguing commercial social media.

        This isn’t going to be the effective slogan that turns the masses who are finally just barely starting to fill Bluesky.

        As soon as any platform sees a measure of success, it becomes a product and thus vulnerable. If we want social media that isn’t just a massive propaganda and advertising machine, I feel like we need to change something else.

        Like physically storming corporate offices and returning the means of production to the people?

        Maybe.

  • Ⓜ3️⃣3️⃣ 🌌@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    All true. And yet sadly until mastodon or better say another fediverse instance do have algorithms and a brain dead stupid onboarding and hyper cool phone apps, that will not do for 99% of the people.

    • miguel@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was told something like this about an article I was pointing out wasn’t on page 1 of google, but was on virtually all other engines. “Unless it’s page 1 of google nobody cares”

      And all I can say is “who cares? those aren’t the people it’s for”

      • Ⓜ3️⃣3️⃣ 🌌@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree, I do the same. But the second part of your reply « who cares those aren’t the guys », years and years watching the fediverse trying to kickstart the whole thing proves it wrong . We, fediverse users, do need those people onboard

        • miguel@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          What “kickstart”? The fediverse isn’t a commercial venture. If we can connect with our friends and interests, it’s already “working”. I find fantastic new people here all the time, doing really niche stuff I’d never find on a platform focused on appealing to everyone.

          If “99%” of people aren’t on it, that’s perfectly acceptable, and just makes it easier for the ones on it to find and talk to their friends. I don’t think we need or want the vast torrent of spammers, downvote bots, and “influencer” types who use whatever gives them clicks.

          • ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Fediverse can’t sustain many niche communities with its level of activity. Even gaming communities on lemmy don’t have enough traffic to constitute communities for individual games. I can’t do after-episode TV discussions on Lemmy because there wouldn’t be enough people commenting to warrant it. If I wanted to search for a D&D game in my local community (a huge US city), I couldn’t do it via Lemmy.

            I can do all this on reddit, which I intend for Lemmy to replace, but I can’t do that yet. So I still crawl reddit for the needs Lemmy can’t replace, but I’d rather never have to open reddit in the first place.

            Same is true for every alternative platform on Fediverse. I’m still using all the mainstream apps I intend to replace.