• Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Suspicious to Google sure, but I don’t see how the authorities would get involved.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the article is telling us in reverse order of discovery which makes it VERY confusing to parse:

      As in:

      Investigators from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Joint Terrorism Task Force retraced the roots of the digital messages Payne allegedly sent to the media outlets.

      Okay, so where did the “digital messages” come from?

      According to the affidavit, Payne used a Proton email address,

      Okay, they knew the source of the message was Proton email. One subpoena of Proton later, they know the IP address(s) of the email client/app logging into Proton. So now they have a whole bunch of IP addresses of VPN exit nodes. So they reach out to the VPN provider:

      Other unusual activity was traced through Payne’s VPN

      So they ask the VPN provider to provide the origin address of the VPN logins, and come back to a cell phone (network) provider

      or network provider.

      So they ask the network provider to provide the info on the owner, except its a burner, so the provider doesn’t know. Hmm, okay so they know its coming from Burner Phone X, but not who owns Burner Phone X. Mr Google, Mr Microsoft, etc, do you have any activity from these Mobile phone company IP addresses at this time?

      That information is tracked by Google

      Ah! So Mr Google does. Anything stand out to you with the activity you’re seeing?

      Investigators were alerted to his accounts after finding an unusually high number of log-ins and failed log-ins from an unfamiliar devices, locations, or networks. That information is tracked by Google, per the affidavit.

      Okay, so its more than just than Burner Phone X accessing these Google accounts/sessions. Yes, the same web sessions/cookies were also used by devices belonging to another Google account, that of Payne.

      Okay we’ve arrested Payne, could this just be an account/device hijacking and Payne be innocent? Well we also seized a rando cell phone with incriminating evidence on it. Could this have been planted?

      Messages from his burner phone, too, matched the number Payne had listed in his personal contact info while applying for unemployment benefits in February.

      So someone texted something at some point to text Burner Phone X. Who was that origin texter sending to Burner Phone X? Payne. So unlikely it was planted and more confirmation it was Payne sending the original threats.

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So they ask the VPN provider to provide the origin address of the VPN logins, and come back to a cell phone (network) provider

        A non-logging VPN provider should not be able to assist with this step.