Ricardo Prada Vásquez, a 32-year-old Venezuelan immigrant legally residing in the United States, has apparently been disappeared to El Salvador’s notorious Center for the Confinement of Terrorism (CECOT) after mistakenly turning onto the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit, Michigan.

The bridge, one of North America’s busiest international crossings, links Detroit with Windsor, Ontario. Due to the complexity of nearby highways, even local residents occasionally take the wrong ramp. For Prada, this innocent mistake led to arrest, imprisonment, and deportation—culminating in his disappearance into a foreign prison.

  • tomkatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    The word is “kidnapped.” Not vanished, not disappeared. Kidnapped.

    Language matters. Stop reporting falsities via soft language.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      15 days ago

      Disappeared (desaparecido) is a historical term that likens the trump administration to latin american military dictatorships

      detenidos desaparecidos, wikipedia page

    • TON618@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      This is not the first time I read this sentiment, but kidnapping sounds softer to me than disappearing someone.

      Kidnapping usually has a ulterior purpose and therefore the implication there’s conditions for return. Like money. Kidnapping is rarely itself the point.

      That’s not the case here with government shipping people off to some foreign concentration camp, never to be seen again.

    • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 days ago

      Kidnapping implies isolated incidents and criminals working outside the government. Disappearing points out that the government is responsible, it’s harsher language

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Yes, criminals kidnap.

        Governments black bag/disappear people.

        Disappearing a person has far more darker undertones, too. kidnapping, at least theres a chance there might be a ransom.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 days ago

      Disappeared has specific connotations for those that grew up with dictators kidnapping opposition figures. I suspect the choice is intentional as it recalls a lot of South American despots.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 days ago

      I think this is disappear as a transitive verb, like it’s saying he was disappeared by the US government. It’s not soft language.

        • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 days ago

          “Disappeared” is the word typically used when authoritarian regimes arrest and incarcerate (or worse) people extrajudicially, without due process. “Trafficked” doesn’t have the authoritarian government connotation.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Yes, language matters and they used it correctly here. As an intransitive verb it means that someone is not detectable. As a transitive verb it means that someone else made them disappear, which usually refers to being abducted, usually by an official group like an arm of the government.

      It has been used that way for decades to indicate when a governement kidnaps citizens to detain or kill them in secret.

      https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disappear

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Since you’re bringing up language points, I’m wondering if you’d be willing to take a left turn with me.

        What are your thoughts about applying the phrase “extraordinary rendition” to their situation?

        I feel that it’s appropriate, but I haven’t seen anyone using it.

        • Match!!@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 days ago

          amnesty international has accused the us government of extraordinary rendition for decades, basically since 2001. this is even worse

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      This is World Socialist Web Site. From what I’ve seen posted from them here, they are not interested in using accurate language. They are advocating for a political philosophy that many here agree with on the surface.

      However, check out their obituary of Nanda Wickremesinghe if you want to try to wrap your head around the correct brand of socialism that they support. They seem more narrow than Emo Phillips in defining who is on their team and who is the anti-revolutionary betrayer. If you want to understand why the bloc the US relies on to vote against fascism can’t rally around one party or leader, look no further.

      For a drinking game, take a sip every tme “comrade” appears in that article.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        tl;dr they’re Trots. Trotsky central, in fact, I mean how nostalgic do you have to be to call yourself the “International Committee of the Fourth International” in currentyear while having like, what, 2k members world-wide.

        …of course, every Trot org is Trotsky central they’re the absolute champions of splintering. Germany has at least three different Trot parties each accusing the others of being Stalinist, all are cults, and all are irrelevant. Best to just ignore them.