
What even is your position on this? Social spending enables more people to participate in the economy. Taking homelessness as an example again, we spend more on social programs keeping people homeless through general aid, and medical assistance than it would cost to house them. That alone would help with the deficit. Then the stability housing would provide allows more people to participate in the economy resulting in more tax revenue, less need for assistance, larger workforce etc… This experiment has already been proven in other countries. That kind of social benefit applies to other areas as well especially in healthcare and food assistance. Sometimes the right thing is also the best thing. You know, if goodness alone isn’t enough to sway you.
Once again you can support this and still want to fix the deficit and national debt crisis.
https://www.va.gov/HOMELESS/nchav/docs/Research_Brief-May2023-The_Evidence_Behind_the_Housing_First_Model-Tsai_508c.pdf
https://www.npscoalition.org/post/fact-sheet-cost-of-homelessness#%3A~%3Atext=A+study+from+Los+Angeles%2Cmore+than+%2480%2C000+per+year.
https://www.vox.com/2014/5/30/5764096/homeless-shelter-housing-help-solutions
https://endhomelessness.org/resources/research-and-analysis/ending-chronic-homelessness-saves-taxpayers-money-2/#%3A~%3Atext=A+chronically+homeless+person+costs%2CAssistance+Grants+in+FY+2017.