I have done more offroading in a tricycle…
One with plastic wheels (and plastic tyres)

Why not both?

std::vector ulUtil {"GNU", "Alpine", "BusyBox", "Toybox"};
int currentUtil = 0;
do
{
	try
	{
		OS(ulUtil[currentUtil], "Linux").use();
	}
	catch (USER::Bored & err)
	{
		currentUtil++;
		continue;
	}
}
while ((currentUtil < ulUtil.size()) || (findMoreUtil(ulUtil)));

I would say they are doing the same with Linux, but I’ll just wait for it to become obvious.

Kate, KDevelop, QtCreator are the ones I use.

Ya.

The only times I am really using ping are when I am expecting some bad connection problem.

Like disconnection, altogether.

Even better, print some anti-empire propaganda.

Give the low-level employee some ideas to quit giving their life to the empire.

This seems to fit all the points I put somewhere else in this thread.

• Nice, glancing angles on the teeth
• Adequate distance between teeth (and unlike mine, the surface between the teeth has been properly smoothed out, making cleaning easier)
• Nice girth on the handle, making hard presses into the object doable without bending the neck
• Despite the girth, the handle shape with properly defined edges, reduces the DEX requirement of the user
  • On top of that, you have chamfers and fillets on those edges, reducing pressure on the skin (which I didn’t even think to ask for)
• None of the form-over-function bs as is done in 2

This is even better than the fork that I have on my table right now.

Though that kink on the back end of the handle seems to trigger my OCD.

I don’t like the bulging teeth in the sides of 5, but I guess that depends more upon what you are eating with it.

I prefer teeth with as acute an angle as viable, so for the front part, I’d go with 2.

The space between the teeth also matters:

• it decides how soft and brittle an object you can pierce with it, without the object breaking down.
• as it decides the variety of objects you can use to clean them.

The fork I use has ~1.5 times the space between teeth as 2

As you said, the handle in 2 is a no. I would be fine with either of 1 and 5 for that.

Though I like 5 for the neck girth of the handle in the 3rd dimension, which would make it last longer and be better for harder stuff, the oval shape seems like it would cause more unwanted turning during use, requiring a higher Dexterity for handling.

While the handle for 3 looks like it would be fine for use, it seems like it would break in ~6 months.

doubt’s

I see what you did there

ed

how effective to you think that rule could be enforced?

Easy. Keep some crack shots handy.

Crack open ⇒ Crack shot

BlG-small?

somehow you remInded me of the BIG-small archItecture.

double click on an icon (too slowly, with a bit too much pressure on the left mouse button, as if that made a difference, probably having single clicked to select first, just in case

I do that.
I use KDE.
I am a programmer.

Also, I make directories with the correct capitalisations for the project names before going inside them and running git clone, which makes another directory in small letters.

Also, when I make header files matching class names, I capitalise them same as the class name. That messes up stuff for some others, sometimes. I like it.

If you are good at metallurgy, you can identify the dirt substance and develop magma, specific to cleaning that particular thing.

Normally, just use Hellflame lvl10 and then brush off the ashes.

More funn!

water man

You can use the term “Aqua Man” to sound fancier.

• I once thought zsh was slow.
• I thought it was slow due to Python
• Then I removed the Manjaro’s OhMyZsh
• Turns out zsh was neither slow nor Python

Though OhMyZsh was slow because I had the system on an HDD

For people outside of the Linux space, Ubuntu is more heard.