I am sorry to tell you but if I didn’t know better, this exchange would have made me question the critics of the AfD and start seeing the AfD as the choice of reason.

You say there are lies but you just offer a strawman argument in the form of a sack of potatoes. If you don’t back up these claims I usually conclude that they are wrong.

You don’t have to convince me that the AfD is ineligible. I am with you. But you can’t claim that the AfD makes up causes and you make up your own. That makes all your claims unbelievable.

Sorry for not noticing.

Thanks, I would have looked differently at your comment if you had directly added that source.

it’s very likley

Then it is still not a quote.

In general, if somebody can proof something easily but does not, then I assume that it is wrong. If others think like me, you create the opposite message of what you want.

immerhin sind die Leute durch diesen bullshit so abgelenkt, dass wir uns jetzt endlich wieder in die Vergangenheit zurück reagieren lassen können

Die AfD ist die Alternative, aber da rassistisch, nicht mehrheitsfähig. Damit können die etablierten Parteien auf Jahre Politik gegen die Mehrheit machen, da nicht noch eine Opposition entstehen wird. Das könnte Zufall sein. Die Medien haben aber die AfD durch auffällig viel Aufmerksamkeit bereits in der Anfangsphase gross gemacht. Daher halte ich die rechte Gefahr für gewollte politische Ablenkung.

Yes. That’s why you should quote what they literally say. It’s not a quote if you write what you think they say.

Das eigentliche Problem ist doch, dass BSW in den Vorhersagen unter 5% war und viele das Bündnis nicht gewählt haben, um die Stimme nicht zu verschwenden.

Das Jahr hat bereits 13 Monate für alle, die das so wollen.

Don’t you see that false quotes undermine your position?

Volle Zustimmung bis auf die Bewertung der Linken. Die Konsequenz ist leider, dass alles nur Theater ist und Argumente eben nicht zählen.

Die Linke bekam meiner Meinung nach nur die Aufmerksamkeit, um das BSW zu verhindern.

Put it next to ballet and grab some popcorn.

Zu Recht, oder?

wenn es den Verächtern des Systems gelingt, mit einem einzigen TikTok-Video ein ganzes Heer von Wählern aufzuwiegeln?

https://feddit.org/post/11269621/6205530

Der Kommentar und der Post sprechen dafür, dass Argumente zweitrangig sind. Politik wird zum zynischen Spiel, durch Unterhaltung Menschen für das eigene Team zu begeistern.

Die SPD muss dies mitmachen denn nur so bekommt man die Stimmen.

Gibt es eine Chance, zum Diskurs zurückzukehren? Ich denke eher, dass bei der nächsten Wahl mehr Parteien Trump nicht inhaltlich aber konzeptionell kopieren werden.

To rise 11 children with the profits from a quarter of a hectare, that’s remarkable.

I don’t think that you make a good point if you yourself make up your point. Please quote the AfD to avoid all doubt.

One teacher said she’d had 10-year-old boys “refuse to speak to [her]…because [she is] a woman”

Does this come from Tate? This could also be a child from a family with partiarchal values. Tate is not the only source of influence. But one incident shouldn’t be part of an article because it is an exception.

What is the general reason for social development? The elite is creating the cirucumstances for change. Why? Divide and conquer.

On an individual level, masculinity makes sense because going to the gym and being confident makes life much more simple than trying to feel compassion with everybody. For boys, masculinity is the common denominator among all cultures. So in a multicultural society, that’s what is going to be established as the fused culture of the next generation.

Girls have the same problems, but their answer, being pretty and doing makeup, doesn’t cause trouble and is thus ignored.

To change this, new forms of education must be developed because math and geography don’t teach the necessary skills to deal with this complex world.

Weimar was a small civil war between soldiers who returned from WW1. That’s why both the left and the right had fighters. Where should the fighters who shoot the bullets come from now?

The fascists came to power because the elite feared that the communists could win. Otherwise, despite massive manipulation, the fascists never got an absolute majority.

There are many issues that other parties simply ignore. There would be far less voteres for the AfD if the other parties would listen. The AfD started with the demand that the rules about euro stability shouldn’t be ignored. That’s not a fascist position.

See the green parts? The ranting is to prevent them from turning yellow, or blue.