

The context in the article is important. Similar to what FUTO preaches-- people don’t donate. That’s why corporate solutions usually win. Better to charge a bit of money so we can have nice things.
The context in the article is important. Similar to what FUTO preaches-- people don’t donate. That’s why corporate solutions usually win. Better to charge a bit of money so we can have nice things.
The plan was to rely on donations, which doesn’t usually work for hosted products.
Or the post training is messed up
I skimmed the article. Home Assistant Supervised seemed like it may be branding for the Docker edition, which apparently it is not.
Why don’t they do lay-down-only seats? Seems like you’d save the same amount of space or more with vastly more comfort.
Wait, does this mean they’re deprecating the docker image?
That is for sharing! I’m up to see what I can do on the UWS (signed up) but maybe that’s too far
There are some people who own a bunch of properties and their job is maintaining them and dealing with the paperwork. And then there are some people who passively collect income and have a management company do that with no real connection to the place…
People deserve to get paid on their work, and currently the best way to do that and survive in America is to work on completely closest source products that don’t respect their users. Open source is probably the most respectful but doesn’t work well as a business. We need something that works reliably for delivering real products that will achieve mass adoption. I think these source available licenses are that.