deleted by creator

“If I may” is Canadian english for “please be quiet, I haven’t finished speaking”.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Nope. It’s an out-of-use term, but it is definitely a synonym of bullying.

I mean, you just keep asking different people whether a thing that does X exists. They’ve all said no, but you can use Y plus mods to do it. Doesn’t seem good enough for you.

Now you’ve risen to “VLC cant do that”. I’ve shown you it can, and you not only beak back at me about it being CLI, but downvote me as well. Thanks for that.

streaming not transcoding

Literally the first sentence:

“This functionality allows you to link VLC’s transcoding capability with a segmenter which will in turn create the series of files needed for http live streaming to the iPhone”

You don’t know what you’re talking about, and you don’t understand your own problem.

Regardless of any info you get here, you will still need to problem-solve. Good luck.

Come on, dude. Now you’re just trolling.

https://wiki.videolan.org/Documentation%3AStreaming_HowTo/Streaming_for_the_iPhone

Quit while you’re ahead and just go do some reading.

I believe photoprism does its face recognition in the cloud, which is a dealbreaker for many.

Oof, a lot of vitriol in this thread.

In the end, security is less about tooling and config, and more about understanding the risks and acting accordingly.

I expose jellyfin to the internet, but only to a specific public IP. That reduced my risk considerably.

Raspberry migrated away from x.org a number of months ago. You’ll need to install all the x and x forwarding components.

There are a number of ways to install nextcloud, and docker is only one of those.

Yes, NC isn’t ideal in many ways, but it shouldn’t be as painful as you’re describing to run it.

It’s easy to cast this as an all-or-nothing kind of thing, but it is possible to make multilateral deals where everyone involved gets what they want. That’s why we want competent and trained people governing these transactions.

I was looking for this. Op seems to be obsessed with “zero trust”, so creating a trusted area for this stuff would be an easy win.

Assuming it’s not a 1-1 NAT it does make for a functional unidirectional firewall.

That’s like saying a router and firewall are the same thing. NAT appears to be a “firewall” because it’s usually deployed with one. NAT itself has no filtering functions the way you’re describing.

Now, a pure router in the sense of simply offering a gateway to another subnet

A “pure” router, as you put it, understands upstream subnets and routing tables. NAT does not, and is usually overlayed on top of an existing routing function.

You can set up NAT between two subnets as an experiment with no iptables and it will do its job.

Op means, as they said, a firewall on the server itself.

NAT is, effectively, a firewall.

No it isn’t. Stop giving advice on edge security.