No. The UK has been trying to get a good deal but who knew that a single country would struggle to get a deal as good as they had when they were negotiating with 27 others on their side.

Like I said, they’re badly in need of new trade partners after they fucked their sweet deal with the EU.

Too soon.

They didn’t cause it, no.

David Cameron caused it by adding it to the Conservative party manifesto to help them get reelected.

I’d be surprised if Russia didn’t at least attempt to influence the referendum in favour of Brexit. They have been interfering in elections for years and Brexit would be beneficial to them as it made both the UK and the EU weaker.

If the punishment for deliberately claiming more in benefits than you’re entitled to is simply to repay the benefits then there’s no incentive to not do it. If you get caught then you’re no worse off than if you’d not broken the law so why not do it?

Having said that, if the punishment for accidentally claiming more than you’re entitled to is so harsh then that is unfair.

I’d imagine that the process for both of the scenarios is the same but it definitely should have some human element in it where intent is taken into account.

The system should protect people from that by having proper checks before the money is paid out.

When the genocide is almost complete.

It’s ridiculous how we’re never saying that things have crossed the lines that have clearly been crossed.

They were on the brink of famine for months and I’m not sure that they ever declared one.

I know that the article is about the unanswered questions but I think that it’s a bit disrespectful (of the BBC) to her to use that photo as the lead.

Sorry…. rereading my post I realised that there should have been a /s on there.

I definitely don’t believe that the tarrifs were reciprocal despite that being the Trump message.

But they’re reciprocal tariffs, not unilateral. It’s like nobody listens.

It’s taking the piss out of Andrew Tate and the gullible guys that he’s convinced are superior to women.