Boston needs less krafty oligarchs but more wu.

Lol best part: clicking reject and pay just lets you see the content. No payment necessary

I believe thats what apnews/reuters do and a lot of newpapers piggy back off them for national/international news but add their own spin to it.

Id upboat this but that might be used as evidence of libel.

Im not stuck on anything. Im simply pointing put the fundamental flaw in your understanding. Your just too dense to grasp it.

Bribery of governmental officials is also illegal, and yet an entire industry exists around it.

The video cameras in stores literally contradict your position that its illegal and yet you hold on to the premise.

The fact facebook just added two lines to their ToS and suddenly their ‘illegal’ behavior was changed to legal demonstrates just how fucking dense you are.

Your issue is you havent yet demonstrated any instances of these laws being upheld in any meaningful manner.

And yet with using grocery stores as a simple example ive entirely dissembled your entire position.

So yes you found a law in a single state, that is entirely ineffectual, doesnt apply to the TSA, and has a ‘this law does not apply’ workaround bigger than the fucking sun for everyone else.

Good job champ, let me introduce you to your need special needs counselor, I’ll leave the rest of your education to them.

😂 you’re just clueless. Literally every store with security cameras puts up a sign on the entrance doors that allows this behavior and there is plenty of case law that supports this. Your wonderful facebook case is a laughably retarded example. Its not even remotely applicable to this conversation.

• its a state law which has 0 impact anywhere except Illinois.
• its not applicable to the tsa or any state/federal agency (aka public entities) which are explicitly excluded from that law.
• nor did it in anyway prevent Facebook from continuing the practice. They just needed to put up a clear and visible notice of the functionality as I explained with the security cameras.
• nor did it have anything to do with individuals in public spaces.
• finally it was settled for a pittance, probably less than the court case would have cost facebook just in lawyer and engineering labor it would have had ro dedicate to the discovery phase.

Im sorry but reality doesnt jive with your reading of laws. Feel free to get laughed out of court attempting to prove me wrong. Its almost like you just googled ‘facial recognition lawsuits’, grabbed the first case that seemed remotely related to this fantasy in your head and ran with with it.

Until you win that magical court case that doesnt exist, stop wasting mine and everyone else’s time with your drivel.

Clearly its not since you dont understand it. The law doesn’t prevent you from being filmed or it being stored. If it did security cameras wouldn’t exist for example. Nor does it apply to governmental agencies.

Feel free to enter any private business with security cameras and you’ll discover they have a wonderful sign on the door informing you of this fact

Jfc dude get a clue. Security cameras are not illegal have never been for private or public spaces. And guess what? They record and store your face. Check any grocery store 7/11, etc, entrance they fucking tell you they’re recording and monitoring you via a security camera system. dropping facial rec software into the mix doesnt change this. You clowns need to stop acting like you know wtf you’re talking about.

1. Jfc you literally claim they do t have a db of your face and then list a bunch of government entities rhat have… A db of your face. Jfc.
2. Feel free to go to a park and take all the photos of peoples faces you want. Its not illegal.

You of course can continue to bury your head in the sand on this it wont change reality. The terms are what they are and no amount of crying by you will change this.

And some of us took these issues seriously ages ago and there are not photos of us on social media linked to our (non-existent) social media accounts.

If you wanted to take it seriously the time was a 2 decades ago.

The key factor here is that the TSA is a government agency, they are not a private entity. None of the laws apply to them w/ respect to biometrics.

Nor do they apply to private spaces you will fully enter. Trust me the lawyers took care of this in terms and conditions.

I can walk up to you in a public space and take your photo and you cant do shit about it as long as i don’t use it in specific ways. Its public data.

Public data does not mean the data can be used in any manner. It means its available to anyone in the public space.

There are literal court cases about this. Finally the government isnt a private entity, so none of your cases/law examples apply to this situation.

Look up any case about someone being pissed their photo was used for a news piece or journalism or artwork.

If you walk into a public space and that public space has cameras with facial recognition software, congratulations! Your face can and will be scanned!

And nothing about that act violates the laws you referenced for the government or any other protected use, such as say journalism.

No the problem is you dont understand what is being said when ‘public data’ is being talked about.

Data is public if you can freely access it, which I can access information about your face simply by being in the same public area as you. Hell you fucking posted it on Facebook probably for anyone to grab from anywhere.

Your face isnt a privacy problem.

1. your face is on your license, they already have a db of our faces.
2. your name was on the ticket, they already know where you were.

If you wanted to push back on your face as private data, the time to do that was many decades ago.

But your major issue is you dont understand terms and definitions.

Incorrect, your face is public data. The consent forms for model are the use of your likeness for commercial purposes which is a very different context.

Lol. Sadly no we don’t do much better at rodent elimination these days. Our sanitation/cleanliness of our living spaces are the primary improvements that prevent things like the bubonic.

We have it at my company its just a very small group and we have to manually enable it for production and its through tools like teleport. Staging and the like its free game there for them for debugging, same infra through. Gives us best of all worlds

The time for democrats to do something was during the last 4 years of biden’s admin, they decided bombing gaza was the priority. ooops.

Let me introduce you to the conflict. Hamas’ behavior is a natural reaction to what israel has been doing for decades and will continue to happen. Both groups are insane fundamentalists. The only difference between them is one has the backing of the superpower and its media apparatus.

No its not that complicated. Israel are straight up shit stains generally speaking. Have been since they immigrated to Jerusalem and then ran a coup with western support. Imagine if Russians showed up in your backyard one day took over your house and then started killing your neighbors. Meanwhile china sitting there going ‘looks good to me guys!’

Swap out relative names with jews and usa.

Thankfully it costs nothing to not send weapons.

yawn thats magical thinking. If that was the case she’d have committed to enforcing America’s laws on not arming genocidal forces if she was serious about. All she did was trot out some tokens and say the same thing she’s said the entire campaign.

Nothing? This is nothing new from her. Its no commitment…its vaguely worded trash.