the robot doesn’t need sleep, won’t get sick, and could (assuming they actually want to be competitive with human labor) require fewer safety precautions on the site (just make the entire area where the robots are as being hazardous and ensure that things won’t fall out of it) allowing for a roof to be constructed before the walls then building the walls underneath it.
the problem I have is that the law (609.772) appears to not only apply to political content, but all content that is
"so realistic that a reasonable person would believe it depicts speech or conduct of an individual who did not in fact engage in such speech or conduct; " and made without consent and wintin 90 days of political party conventions or after absentee voting starts.
By the way it is written the “presidents play Minecraft” series which most informed people would fully understand was not made my any presidents would likely fall under this law.
because one side is prioritizing democratic principles and the other is making an argument that could be related to the first amendment. Twitter absolutely isn’t doing this for any good reason, but the argument could be used for one.
especially the anti-toxicity people
is that actually usable (including app installs) for years without ever contacting a phone after initial setup?
I find the feature hilarious, admittedly this is mostly because I almost never use my phones camera so it tries to use memes or anime screenshots/art to do its job.
this leads to interesting results such as nightscape (shows picture I took of a burning building), clothes (shows furry porn), dog (image of Junko), cat (same image), sports (music videos)
asbestos at least was the best option until a couple years ago for numerous applications.
counter argument: rules are meant to be followed to the letter and not a micrometer further. if a rule specifies that you only have to surrender phones the day after they were spotted then what constitutes the same phone is the most important question.
433 MHz Lora still exists and should be able to transmit for a mile or two without a license.
how many smartwatches existed that can be used without a phone?
because humans with resources (money) should be allowed to use it how they please, be it on tungsten cubes or pointless devices
because humans with resources (money) should be allowed to use it how they please, be it on tungsten cubes or pointless devices
*yor’oe
perhaps you aren’t aware of how many instances there are that have much looser rules
it seems to hates any conflict, where’s the doxxing, the death threats, the thousands of downvotes (or community notes)?
that still uniquely identifies you to the company and would make having multiple accounts that are fully separate harder. in addition there would be no way of knowing whether or not the government has or hasn’t hidden another layer of data (like your name) in the certificate.
This would also be trivial for children to bypass as it would need to be usable an unlimited number of times (or else individuals couldn’t have multiple accounts) therefore it would only take one adult sharing their cert and signature publicly for any child to have a valid certificate.
what kind of shitty news coverage doesn’t even have images of the 75yard hill the vehicle rolled down?
and this is why humans are bad, a tool is neither good or bad, sure a tool can use a large amount of resources to develop only to be completely obsolete in a year but only humans (so far) have the ability (and stupidity) to be both in charge of millions of lives and trust a bunch of lithographed rocks to create tarrif rates for uninhabited islands (and the rest of the world).
it would almost certainly need to be done at a fast charger, not at home unless it could do only a few cells at a time. Remember the golden rule: “Don’t set the house on fire by overloading the wiring”.
yes, however you absolutely can budget yourself into it.