Bsck when I was on Windows, I had used GenP for YEARS without knowing the full form. I have now found the answer.

some random mfs with 400TB of hoarded YouTube videos will emerge out of hiding

If you still saw Spiderman, I’ve got news for you…

Well, did the Pope even say ‘thank you’?

Extroverts gonna have a feast.

If the shooter hits the target, then that’s not Trump.

Ironically, the FMHY wiki is 10000x better than the /r/piracy megathread.

It would be understandable if it were something like a cat riding a motorcycle, but this is just a dude shrugging. There was no need for it to be AI.

Thanks for sharing that linked comment. I knew there were other things that weren’t as talked about, but I didn’t have the energy to look into them and draft a comprehensive insight with citations.

I’m not sure I understood; a line for what?

I’ll try to answer based on what I think you meant: if there is a software with a person with undesirable views in control of it, I’d try to boycott that software if feasible.

This is not about “the FOSS community”. It doesn’t matter if you developed closed-source or open-source, doesn’t matter if you license your software with AGPL or NULA, if you make a comment that’s seemingly transphobic/misogynistic, people WILL freak out.

The reason you might see this occur more frequently in open-source spaces could be sue to the fact that issue trackers and PRs provide much less filtered responses than corporate social media accounts and blogs.

Personally, I’d want my software to value basic human decency, no matter how good the code is. If the developer lashes out at an inclusive change in a single line of documentation, I’m not using that browser even if it could solve my taxes.

This is just my take though, and if you want to use the browser, then go for it.

I’ve checked out the PR, and it does look bad. But I’d like to see a justification. The comment seems blatantly transphobic/misogynistic. Seems like you’re saying that my understanding is extreme. How could yours be refuted?

Brigading was clearly not justified, but as per my apparently extreme opinions, so isn’t the original reply?