Hard doubt. Unless it’s a closed source fork

I’m not an apple person, so even I saw news about iOS I thought “how the fuck are they on 26 already?”

I didn’t really care, but I appreciate the explanation.

Let me guess, closed source (client and server) using custom encryption.

Hope to be wrong in both accounts.

Is this Musk’s and meta end goal? Make internet ultra shitty so that every social network needs age verification/user real data so they can use their dominant position to target people more viciously?

It’s not like of 99% of people cares about giving their actual name and details.

Yes and no. The same comment on different communities can have vastly different results, so I think it’s too easy to just “justify” why the ratios you don’t agree with are there, while the ones you do are obviously “fair”

Kudos on your mental fortitude. The level is stupidity that guy is showing nearly broke me.

Are we gonna have a reverse Obama, were they claim Trump was actually born on Mississippi and that the SA birth certificate is fake?

Look, I’m not particular about rice, but if I see long rice on the risotto, what I’ll do isn’t even covered in the Geneva conventions.

Your reasoning is a random one, with the exact same validity and any other random one. “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence” rings any bell?

Everybody hates Russia and would be eager to fight if Russia didn’t have nuclear bombs. Remove the critical voices and we are ready to go.

Wait, you claim “everybody” hates Russia but doesn’t fight because Russia has nuclear bombs, so they are removing critical voices to be able to attack… Are nuclear weapons powered by critical voices? Or are you hallucinating?

I haven’t said anything about those laws making sense or not, I’ve only implied your reasoning doesn’t make sense.

My theory? To fight Nintendo switch 2 scalpers. It makes more sense than your theory if you could think about it.

Flightless, but fightfull

Physical distance of his testicles and some pliers might be the deciding factor between giving all the data and ALL the data.

This is called gate keeping

And I like it.

I want him to say much more. Starting with “No! Not there bees!”

“Chinese government killed their own people, it’s fine! They are basically property”

I say, why not both?

I guess the Chinese soldiers were minding their own business at home with their families, and not there to just put down protests against authoritarianism.

Can you share that link? I’m curious how the 7 “non directly caused by protesters” died. They just had a random accident? Lovers quarrel? Food poisoning?

Thanks! Let me pack my gun and some weed for the trip, I’ll be there in a jiffy.