Why, a hexvex of course!

  • 1 Post
  • 26 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle


  • Fishing boat where it shouldn’t be - prosecute and fine.

    Addressing the migrant comment - if you catch a small boat, your government gets to pay to settle or remove the occupants; if it sneaks through your government has to pay nothing. The game theory says “I saw no boat”. Shift the reward mechanism, have the boat’s departure nation pay half the costs, suddenly the reward mechanism says “boat spotted”.





  • That’s the real joke behind it all, the use of AI is such a problem because we’re turning education into a stamp dispenser - everyone needs an A* to get anywhere.

    AI has given every student a path to this - however if industry stopped demanding that universities train their damn staff for them, and instead insist we teach their future staff how to be trained (as well as giving them subject specific knowledge), then we’d see the misalignment vanish. Once the need for an A* to land a good job is gone, then so is the misalignment.




  • Microcosmic example. Take 3 people - a newborn (A), a professor of biology (B) and a professor in philosophy ©.

    You’re easily able to argue that both professors are more intelligent than the newborn (A<B and A<C). However, you’re unable to establish (in any meaningful way) whether B<C, or C<B; even B=C is out. This is because both professors have knowledge the other does not, so trying to meaningfully equate or order them in relation to one another is an act of futility.

    This is a fun example of a partial order that most of us see every day (in a less extreme form).






  • “ennui and a trapped feeling … no control over your own life”

    That describes adulthood for a lot more people than we’re willing to admit. Adulthood often has the illusion of more choices, but for many those choices have one realistic option.

    As a kid, there is at least the feeling of “I’ll grow up and it will be great”, as a working adult it used to be “I’ll retire and it’ll be great”; these days it’s “well, I hope there isn’t teams meetings in the afterlife”.




  • At the root it’s a very difficult topic to address, let me change my language a little to avoid the politics implied by the room.

    When you generalise a negative trait to a particular gender, you are making a sexist and hateful comment. The “emotional woman” and the “deceitful gold digger”, the “violent man” and the “potential rapist” - the former would lead to a talk with HR, the latter leads to open agreement and often accolade.

    The argument made for this discrepancy is that it is redressing the systemic sexism built into our society, but I think that it has ceased to do so and us now fuelling the misogyny more than it is addressing it.

    There is a need to redress societal imbalance that disadvantages women - however hatred only breeds more hatred. The path currently taken is wrong, and history will show that to be true.