I wouldn’t define flipping coins as decision making. Especially when it comes to blanket governmental policy that has the potential to kill (or severely disable) millions of people.
You seem to not want any people to teach you anything. And are somehow completely dejected at such perceived actions.
LLM does no decision making. At all. It spouts (as you say) bullshit. If there is enough training data for “Trump is divine”, the LLM will predict that Trump is divine, with no second thought (no first thought either). And it’s not even great to use as a language-based database.
Please don’t even consider LLMs as “AI”.
Your argument becomes idiotic once you understand the actual technology. The AI bullshit machine’s agenda is “give nice answer” (“factual” is not an idea that has neural center in the AI brain), and “make reader happy”. The human “bullshit” machine, has many agendas, but it would have not got so far if it was spouting just happy bullshit (but I guess America is a becoming a very special case).
What is this “check-mate, atheists” sort of logic? We are not birds. Also we aren’t dogs, so eating chocolate doesn’t kill us either.
This also only happens when you heat teflon past its breaking point, at which point, it’s no different than burning plastic.
Just a random point: the actual coating (teflon) is completely non-toxic. The manufacturing process of teflon is the cause of a large amount of PFOAs in nature/food chain. The pan has no PFOAs most likely after the first cooking session, or likely before (unless the factory just completely brazenly does not even wash it once)
Correct. You’re right, without context (or as you put it - living under a rock) one comes to the wrong conclusion.
Is that percentage 100%? Because any desire to take land without any respect for the ones living there for thousands of years has a certain… Lebensraum ambience attached to it
Since this sublemmy doesn’t have any requirement for the title to be the same as the source, can we actually have a correct title: “Microsoft abides to laws in EU and does <…>”, or even better “Microsoft is forced under EU law to <…>”.
The title makes it appear as if it’s out of charity and goodness of their corporate heart. (Fabrication)
🤷♂️ At least the 'Muricans leave alone the actual Europe. Gives me Schadenfreude
Hey, don’t put any random rich-ish person from Europe into the same US billionaire basket
Maybe worth looking not at the absolute number, but the relative Israeli population vs perpetrated war crimes
A fun fact is, nobody (including complicit Germans) knew how evil the concentration camps and the actions of the Nazi party were, until the allies actually won…
You might very well be very past that point, just whimsically unaware.
Honestly, this is a perfect reductio ad absurdum why executive order power should not be given to one person (and their admin) for a country of 400 million…
How else will the Republicans push more subliminal messaging to the uneducated, overhears snippets of a title, masses?
Teflon is just as poisonous as any plastic above breakdown temperature (260C). I.e.: not really.
There is no eternal item in the human mortal coil.
They could start throwing out steel slag into rivers from the factories, you know. Which is the analogue.
If you watch the video, it says there is no reason to switch, as teflon is not poisonous. The catalyst chemicals in manufacturing when released into rivers and other places is the biggest source. Then some shoddy packaging of fast foods.
PFASes are not only used for your pan.
Well barely. Their given reason is it’s “not mission critical” which is a statement veeeeryyy far from “We are doing it out of spite for electric cars” or “We want our oil narrative to hold from our highest echelons of social hierarchy” or whatever other insane reason
Narcissism as a fascist dictatorship of a whole country.
That’s just ridiculous. To spend money to remove infrastructure, out of hidden spite.
At some point, with a quarter hundred downvotes and many negative replies, the person you should first inspect is not the other, but self.