Ea-nasir strikes again!

Excellent joke my fellow Germans.

Rich people just go to rehab in the form of a long vacation then get addicted again the moment they come back in contact with society.

Yeah, if reddit wants to start sending all the people who made its content their fair share then by all means. Doubt they’re gonna make any attempt to do that, though.

I know your question is rhetorical, but hypothetically China could do that with the aim of whipping up their population into hating the American government more, making them more willing to swallow local authoritarianism and foreign imperialism framed as national defense. That’s basically what the US is doing in the current arrangement, only reversed.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

It’s already on for real. Hypernormalization is a bitch. That might shock us all for an afternoon but we’d be back to the same discourse a week later.

It’d be a bit like if China and it’s entire sphere once a year went crazy commemorating the Kent State or Haymarket Massacre. They wouldn’t be wrong to say these are bad things, but it’d clearly be in service of some ulterior motive.

This is by design, too. Disenfranchise the minority and then keep pretending society is meritocratic and then “if they really wanted to survive or escape they would have made more money.”

The Supreme Court ruled that the president is above the law during Biden’s term. It was entirely in his power to take enforcement action and let the courts sort it out later.

GPT-3 is ancient technology.

And a competent human dishwasher gets a better clean than a machine. That’s not going to stop their adoption. They will just keep some fraction of the workforce previously performing a given task to check answers.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

I don’t remember there being CCTV everywhere in the wild west.

Nobody is stopping anyone from requesting the information from users via, say, a form they fill out, or enabling data tracking for a specific user-enabled purpose. The only thing people are advocating against is users’ info being collected without their knowledge, consent, or both. Nobody is losing any freedom.

That ruling defined official duties so broadly it’s actually virtually impossible for anything he does to not be “official” by the SC’s standards.

The ruling outlined that official duties includes pretty much everything he does while president, unless he explicitly states it’s not in his capacity as president or for national interests, which he won’t do in court, so effectively, yes, he has complete immunity. The “official” part is just a fig leaf to give the ruling the appearance of jurisprudence.

Please do not put the idea in Trump’s head that he can mint new denominations. They will all have his face.