“and communist revolutionary and Marxist theorist, leader of the Bolsheviks (1903-1924), head of government of the Russian SFSR (1917-1924) and the Soviet Union (1922-1924), of which he is considered the founder.”
Yea absolutely non communist… Sure… mf
But it was not about Lenin at all, but about not separating oneself from the communist past, even if today’s Russia is not a communist state.
Also, I had not read the end of your comment. The communist part of Russia’s history is the best one. But if you’re a tsarist or fascist I understand why you may think otherwise
Reading Lenin would really help you
“and communist revolutionary and Marxist theorist, leader of the Bolsheviks (1903-1924), head of government of the Russian SFSR (1917-1924) and the Soviet Union (1922-1924), of which he is considered the founder.”
Yea absolutely non communist… Sure… mf
But it was not about Lenin at all, but about not separating oneself from the communist past, even if today’s Russia is not a communist state.
Also, I had not read the end of your comment. The communist part of Russia’s history is the best one. But if you’re a tsarist or fascist I understand why you may think otherwise
What? Lmao
What could possibly make you think we were arguing that Lenin is not socialist? There is a small hint in “Marxism-Leninism”