The ruling, which is limited to the Southern District of Texas, prohibited the administration from using the wartime law because the president’s claims about a Venezuelan gang do not add up to an “invasion.”
Don’t take this the wrong way, but neither of those are what I would consider credible sources for something of this magnitude. Anything with the word “truth” in it is immediately suspect in my view, and a Reddit post is absolutely not a primary source (not to mention, Reddit has been blocked in my router since 2023).
Both of those seem like conspiracy rabbit holes to me. Show me something posted by a credible outlet, fact checked, and confirmed by another credible outlet and we’ll talk.
Dude, they just asked for some reputable sources. I have combed through all this stuff several times, and while it is absolutely sus, it’s pretty much all conjecture. If the theories they posit are correct then it should be able to be confirmed with the actual voting data, someone asking to see that confirmation isn’t fucking sea lioning.
Exactly. The most I’ve heard are a few isolated incidents of intimidation, attempted arson, and some voter roll purges (but they were allowed to use a provisional ballot).
There’s several articles covering each, but this one from USA Today covers them at least in an overview.
None of that is anywhere near the magnitude OC is claiming, and is no more or less than any other election year with the exception of the 30,000 to 40,000 damaged voter registration forms in Arizona (see USA Today link above). And of those, it wouldn’t have made a difference even if all of those voted for Harris.
Again, as much as I wish there was fraud or something on a scale large enough to change the outcome, there’s no credible evidence pointing to that.
Without a decent math background, or at least statistics, it’s hard to explain…
I doubt you “combed” through it, but rather skimmed over it…
and hell, post-covid conspiracy shit non-stop, i pretty much hate everyone that tries to talk about anything like that,
and especially anyone that links to a video podcast to explain something…
and to be a hypocrite, here is a great video, with actual reputable or at least educated people,
on an actually well established podcast, breaking down hard math, and computational statistical analysis
with actually informative graphs.
this is a founder of Election Truth Alliance, starting the video when the slides start: https://youtu.be/AWSWqn7UHYM?t=164
the two long/didn’t watch version is: in suspicious counties, they show this huge anomaly where after a certain amount of votes
are cast and counted, the percentage of votes starts to change in a way that no other election has shown… with the exception of 2020, and recently Russia and the country of Georgia (highly suspected of russian tampering)
…
the law of large numbers shows that the first 10% of votes cast should roughly have the same results as 100% of votes cast… this is the basis for exit polls, btw… they don’t get everyone’s results on exit, but enough to give a very accurate prediction…
…
so what’s apparent in the data analyzed, is it breaks the normal bell curve, a distribution seen in almost all of statistics of this nature, as is normally seen in all elections, everywhere in history… except for these votes for trump and the senate… the normal bell curve IS seen for all other votes on the SAME ballots… so people who voted democrat on everything else on the ticket, suddenly started voted for trump and a republican senate at the same time, anomalously, but voted normally for everything else…
after a certain amount of votes are cast, with democrats leading in highly populated democrat strongholds, suddenly start shifting to trump getting 60% of the vote… it’s mathy so it’s hard to understand or communicate, but it’s mathematically impossible…
key, highly improbable points are:
The “Russian Tail” & The “Crocodile Mouth”
(names for the anomalous shapes seen in what should be a bell curve)
All 7 swing states go to Trump
All 88 counties in those states flip red
Harris underperforms the down ballot race by 6% nationwide
Don’t take this the wrong way, but neither of those are what I would consider credible sources for something of this magnitude. Anything with the word “truth” in it is immediately suspect in my view, and a Reddit post is absolutely not a primary source (not to mention, Reddit has been blocked in my router since 2023).
Both of those seem like conspiracy rabbit holes to me. Show me something posted by a credible outlet, fact checked, and confirmed by another credible outlet and we’ll talk.
ah, so you’re a “i don’t believe you, will ask for sources, and then not look at them and continue to not believe you”.
have a nice day, sea lion
Dude, they just asked for some reputable sources. I have combed through all this stuff several times, and while it is absolutely sus, it’s pretty much all conjecture. If the theories they posit are correct then it should be able to be confirmed with the actual voting data, someone asking to see that confirmation isn’t fucking sea lioning.
Exactly. The most I’ve heard are a few isolated incidents of intimidation, attempted arson, and some voter roll purges (but they were allowed to use a provisional ballot).
There’s several articles covering each, but this one from USA Today covers them at least in an overview.
None of that is anywhere near the magnitude OC is claiming, and is no more or less than any other election year with the exception of the 30,000 to 40,000 damaged voter registration forms in Arizona (see USA Today link above). And of those, it wouldn’t have made a difference even if all of those voted for Harris.
Again, as much as I wish there was fraud or something on a scale large enough to change the outcome, there’s no credible evidence pointing to that.
Without a decent math background, or at least statistics, it’s hard to explain…
I doubt you “combed” through it, but rather skimmed over it…
and hell, post-covid conspiracy shit non-stop, i pretty much hate everyone that tries to talk about anything like that,
and especially anyone that links to a video podcast to explain something…
and to be a hypocrite, here is a great video, with actual reputable or at least educated people,
on an actually well established podcast, breaking down hard math, and computational statistical analysis
with actually informative graphs.
this is a founder of Election Truth Alliance, starting the video when the slides start:
https://youtu.be/AWSWqn7UHYM?t=164
the two long/didn’t watch version is: in suspicious counties, they show this huge anomaly where after a certain amount of votes
are cast and counted, the percentage of votes starts to change in a way that no other election has shown… with the exception of 2020, and recently Russia and the country of Georgia (highly suspected of russian tampering)
…
the law of large numbers shows that the first 10% of votes cast should roughly have the same results as 100% of votes cast… this is the basis for exit polls, btw… they don’t get everyone’s results on exit, but enough to give a very accurate prediction…
…
so what’s apparent in the data analyzed, is it breaks the normal bell curve, a distribution seen in almost all of statistics of this nature, as is normally seen in all elections, everywhere in history… except for these votes for trump and the senate… the normal bell curve IS seen for all other votes on the SAME ballots… so people who voted democrat on everything else on the ticket, suddenly started voted for trump and a republican senate at the same time, anomalously, but voted normally for everything else…
after a certain amount of votes are cast, with democrats leading in highly populated democrat strongholds, suddenly start shifting to trump getting 60% of the vote… it’s mathy so it’s hard to understand or communicate, but it’s mathematically impossible…
key, highly improbable points are:
(names for the anomalous shapes seen in what should be a bell curve)