• meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 days ago

    “stolen” is such an exaggerated misrepresentation…news organizations should really do better. When you steal something from someone, the owner loses access to it. She just liberated public research.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Also I have met people who have published some pretty important papers, most of them use scihub on a weekly basis, and none of them care that their papers get “stolen”. And they all have some strong opinions about Elsevier.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      This is why I hate the recent trend where people are saying “If buying isn’t owning, piracy isn’t stealing”

      “Piracy”, or more accurately “copyright infringement” was never stealing. What you’re doing is violating the government-granted monopoly on copying something. That’s so different from stealing.

  • Luke@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    “People often say to me, ‘You don’t pay the authors. You don’t pay the reviewers. You hardly print anymore. The Web is free. Why do you charge?’” said H. Frederick Dylla, the former director of the American Institute of Physics and board member of the Association of American Publishers. “It sounds like a compelling argument. But it actually isn’t.”

    Albert Greco, a publishing expert at Fordham University who is working on a book about scholarly publishing, said those making that argument are forgetting everything they learned or should have learned in economics class.

    “There are costs,” he said. “Does The Washington Post have a paywall?”

    Yes.

    “So is it fair then if some high-school student wants to really follow the Supreme Court and doesn’t have the money to pay?” Greco said. “Life is a bitter mystery. We can’t give everything away for free. It’s not that kind of country.”

    These assholes don’t even have a better reason for fleecing everyone than base greed, and they don’t try to hide it.

    • 1Fuji2Taka3Nasubi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      ‘You don’t pay the authors. You don’t pay the reviewers.

      We can’t give everything away for free. It’s not that kind of country.

      Instead, he just takes everything from authors and reviewers for free. Is he living in a different country?

  • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I realize this is an older article from 2016. But it’s just so good, I had to share it in case some here aren’t familiar with her. Her name is Alexandra Elbakyan and she’s the person behind Sci-Hub, a library website that provides free access to millions of research papers, regardless of copyright, by bypassing publishers’ paywalls in various ways.

    And she’s my personal hero. :)

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    You see, the problem, publishers, is that your “business” should not have been a business in the first place.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    As someone in science that has used this many times, I can’t emphasize enough how much this has accelerated research in the modern era. I am so grateful for her work.

    • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I get so pissed when I think about Aaron Swartz. He was a bit before his time. I’d love it if here were still around. There would be so much more people rallying behind him these current times.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I was telling a friend about him the other day. She said she found it odd how it seems like he became a martyr for his ideals, in that the way that he is remembered is almost like he’s a mythological figure, more ideal than man. I agreed with her that the loss of humanity due to such a high profile death is tragic, but that it wasn’t the internet who turned him into a martyr, but the FBI (and whoever else was pushing for his prosecution).

        They threw the book at Aaron Schwartz because they wanted to set a precedent. They wanted to turn him into a symbol, and that led to his death. I’m proud of how the internet rallied around him and made him into a different kind of symbol, but like you, I feel sad to think about what could have been if he hadn’t been killed (I know that he died by suicide, but saying that he “died” felt too passive). It sucks that he’s just a part of history now.

        • VitabytesDev@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Legends walk among us

          It’s a game that carries a lot of memes, and I see you have already some replies about your comment being “sus”.

          • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            Ahh ok! Thanks for the explanation.

            I have no idea why my comment is seen as being “sus” or why my choice of words would trigger anyone.

            But meh, Lemmy being Lemmy, I guess.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Still insane to me that one woman literally saves the world of science from all this corruption

  • Crotaro@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Alexandra is the hero students (and scientists) all over the world need! And I’m so glad that my former profs acknowledged and recommended Sci-Hub to us. So many people wouldn’t be able to graduate without debt (or “even more debt” for the Americans) otherwise.