• Yaky@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    To configure most suckless tools you need to… recompile them. The readme says:

    Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it’s pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions.

    But if you are trying to compile suckless tools, you are already in too deep.

    • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      LOL yes, I had a look at those too when I was looking for a more minimal terminal. Noped the fuck out when I read you had to recompile the tools to configure them.

      It’s not that this is beyond my skill level, but that is just so … why would I want to do that?

      • Abnorc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        It’s probably not that bad, but the attitude towards novice users is a red flag. I get not having the time or energy to respond to each and every help request, but putting that in a readme is basically telling users that they’re on their own. I think I’d get ridiculed if I started asking for help.

        It’s a good strategy if you’re trying to keep your software niche though.

        To be clear, it seems like cool software. Compiling every time you need to change your config seems excessive to me, but I think I get the vibe. There’s just no reason to be preemptively hostile to new users.