Lol. I’m talking about the party as a whole. The ones you speak of that use their power to put down revolution and progressive candidates like Bernie alike, but appear “powerless” to do anything else like “stop fascism”. What interest does that party have in stopping fascism?
See, it’s not a dynamic where they are all-powerful in one aspect and powerless in another. It’s that their interests are very heavily weighted to the first aspect, and that informs their behavior.
So tell me, why should they care? Why should they go out of their way? They won’t be the ones directly affected and in fact it’s a great campaign tool if their opponent is openly fascist. Not to mention the money being made off of it. If they get accused of allowing fascism to take root they can just say they were powerless to stop it, and you fuckers will believe them. Tell me how this isn’t a net positive for anybody, without an identity that lands them or their loved ones directly in the crosshairs (i.e. the vast majority), that has a ruling class position in society?
Liberals aren’t stopping the revolution or fascism. Liberals generally just support the status quo, with tweaks or not. Fascism and liberalism are both based on the same underlying base, when a liberal society finds itself in decay and dire circumatances, it often becomes fascist.
What are they gonna rage against…the basically non existent left wing?
Anyone who isn’t actively killing minorities while yelling racial slurs is now a leftist commie autist.
Right Wing defines “Left” as anyone with the least bit of empathy and/or basic intelligence.
Real “Leftists” exclude any potential ally who disagrees on any point, no matter how obscure.
On “Purity Testing” within the Left
Schrödinger’s Liberal. All powerful when it comes to stopping the Revolution; utterly powerless to stop fascism
What legitimate personal interest do establishment democrats have in stopping fascism?
Yes, AOC, Bernie and Omar are just salivating to have concentration camps open.
All have run as Democrats in elections.
Lol. I’m talking about the party as a whole. The ones you speak of that use their power to put down revolution and progressive candidates like Bernie alike, but appear “powerless” to do anything else like “stop fascism”. What interest does that party have in stopping fascism?
See, it’s not a dynamic where they are all-powerful in one aspect and powerless in another. It’s that their interests are very heavily weighted to the first aspect, and that informs their behavior.
So tell me, why should they care? Why should they go out of their way? They won’t be the ones directly affected and in fact it’s a great campaign tool if their opponent is openly fascist. Not to mention the money being made off of it. If they get accused of allowing fascism to take root they can just say they were powerless to stop it, and you fuckers will believe them. Tell me how this isn’t a net positive for anybody, without an identity that lands them or their loved ones directly in the crosshairs (i.e. the vast majority), that has a ruling class position in society?
Liberals aren’t stopping the revolution or fascism. Liberals generally just support the status quo, with tweaks or not. Fascism and liberalism are both based on the same underlying base, when a liberal society finds itself in decay and dire circumatances, it often becomes fascist.
No
Mind elaborating?