• Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    If china manages its relationship with India well enough that the us can’t get Indian help during ww3, then that’s pretty much checkmate for the us.

    Nuclear war or help from India is literally the only possibility of western imperialism ever defeating china (although in either scenario, western imperialism will also collapse).

    • ☭CommieWolf☆@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Extremely overhyping India’s military capabilities, in every skirmish with Chinese troops they have repeatedly lost over the past decades. Their equipment is also bizarrely sourced, half from NATO and half from Russia, meaning theres low equipment standardization and precarity in the event that they piss off either bloc. India is completely insignificant militarily, and heavily economically reliant on both China, and the US. And in any scenario where they fight a conventional war with China, they will lose, and in the event of a nuclear war, nobody wins anyways.

      • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago
        1. I wasn’t purely talking about military strength. India has a relatively large industrial base (decent amounts of steel production and large labor pool) which could in theory supply the west
        2. India has the ability to help enforce a blockade of the straits of Malacca.
        3. India has borders with China, meaning they could occupy a front and divert resources
        4. India is building up missiles and ships. It’s not as if they don’t have any domestic production of weapons.
        5. India has a large population for youth, and therefore could supply the west with a large amount of manpower

        I still think that in a ww3 scenario, China will win no matter what, but the west could drag things out much longer if they have India.