The teens claimed CBP targeted them because they hadn’t booked hotels for their entire stay in Hawaii.

“They found it suspicious that we hadn’t fully booked our accommodations for the entire five weeks in Hawaii,” Pohl said. “We wanted to travel spontaneously. Just like we had done in Thailand and New Zealand.”

  • TON618@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Is it that common? How do they handle backpackers?

    I’ve literally never gone on a single multi-week vacation in my entire life with fully booked accommodation for the whole thing. I book the majority of the first week and I know when I’m flying back, but in between I’m mostly guided by the wind.

    I can’t book hotels in places I don’t know I’ll be going.

    • Elextra@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s not the only thing. It’s a combination of limited/no living accommodations and no income. If you don’t have the income to stay for 5 weeks for example, they will send you back.I’m talking like going to Australia or US with just $500 or something for 5 weeks. I can cite some episodes when I get off work today and you can see the process.

        • Elextra@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          But overall CBP looks at funds. If someone can’t afford their stay, they become suspicious.

          EDIT: Adding, they ask how much people intend to spend or call banks to verify