Sludgehammer@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoUS attorney for DC accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda’, threatens non-profit statuswww.nzherald.co.nzexternal-linkmessage-square52linkfedilinkarrow-up1447arrow-down15
arrow-up1442arrow-down1external-linkUS attorney for DC accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda’, threatens non-profit statuswww.nzherald.co.nzSludgehammer@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square52linkfedilink
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoI went there; my first take is that it’s full of wanna be editors who were rejected or edited out. What am I missing?
minus-squareTronBronson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 month agoNothing people hate on Wikipedia for all kinds of reasons. Mostly because they don’t believe in checking sources. And when information is cited it becomes woke.
minus-squarebluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·30 days agoThe truth pretty much always is
minus-squareBloomcole@lemm.eeBannedBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoRemoved by mod
I went there; my first take is that it’s full of wanna be editors who were rejected or edited out.
What am I missing?
Nothing people hate on Wikipedia for all kinds of reasons. Mostly because they don’t believe in checking sources. And when information is cited it becomes woke.
The truth pretty much always is
Removed by mod