vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 14 days agoFBI arrests judge in escalation of Trump immigration enforcement effortwww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square193linkfedilinkarrow-up1909arrow-down15cross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1904arrow-down1external-linkFBI arrests judge in escalation of Trump immigration enforcement effortwww.cnbc.comvegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 14 days agomessage-square193linkfedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
minus-squarefaythofdragons@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·13 days ago my interpretation is they had paperwork to arrest in a public venue Incorrect. An administrative warrant gives no grounds for an arrest, it authorizes fact-finding only. The legality of that action is what’s in question. What law do you think allows ICE to dictate what exits to use?
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·13 days agoI’ll wait till I see the supreme court weigh in. I don’t think you’re wrong but that’s where we are at.
minus-squarefaythofdragons@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·13 days agoIf you don’t think I’m wrong, why are you defending ICE here?
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·13 days agoI’m not. I’m trying to be measured and not let the GOP control the news cycle.
minus-squarefaythofdragons@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoYour entire argument has been “lets not get angry, maybe ICE is allowed to do this”. That’s not being measured, that’s defending ICE.
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 days agoOk, who is fighting ICE in the courts?
minus-squarefaythofdragons@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·13 days agoHere’s a similar case from last year, if you’re asking for court precedents. ICE was arresting people using an administrative warrant and not an arrest warrant, and it was ruled unconstitutional. https://www.aclusocal.org/en/press-releases/court-rules-against-ice-knock-and-arrests
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-213 days agoThank you for the info The order clarifies that while the “knock-and-talk” practice, as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court, is considered constitutional… We will get past this. If we are smart we cannot be fooled by the trump propaganda machine. I believe in us.
Incorrect. An administrative warrant gives no grounds for an arrest, it authorizes fact-finding only.
What law do you think allows ICE to dictate what exits to use?
I’ll wait till I see the supreme court weigh in. I don’t think you’re wrong but that’s where we are at.
If you don’t think I’m wrong, why are you defending ICE here?
I’m not. I’m trying to be measured and not let the GOP control the news cycle.
Your entire argument has been “lets not get angry, maybe ICE is allowed to do this”. That’s not being measured, that’s defending ICE.
Ok, who is fighting ICE in the courts?
Here’s a similar case from last year, if you’re asking for court precedents. ICE was arresting people using an administrative warrant and not an arrest warrant, and it was ruled unconstitutional.
https://www.aclusocal.org/en/press-releases/court-rules-against-ice-knock-and-arrests
Thank you for the info
We will get past this. If we are smart we cannot be fooled by the trump propaganda machine.
I believe in us.